For Immediate Release
S.T.O.P. Report Details Local Police Deportation Data Partnerships With ICE
(New York, NY 11/19/24) â Today, the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (S.T.O.P.), a New York-based privacy and civil rights group, released Deportation Data Centers: How Fusion Centers Circumvent Sanctuary City Laws, a report detailing how Department Of Homeland Security-backed fusion centers drive deportation by enabling ICE to coopt local police data. Fusion centersâ sweeping, nationwide network combines state and regional data sharing centers to promote law enforcement collaboration, including ICE. Deportation Data Centers comes shortly after Donald Trumpâs reelection brings renewed attention to the scale of American immigration enforcement.
SEE: Report - Deportation Data Centers: How Fusion Centers Circumvent Sanctuary City Laws
https://www.stopspying.org/deportation-data-centers
Politico - Trumpâs immigration crackdown is expected to start on Day 1
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/18/immigration-100-days-trump-executive-action-00189286
âFusion centers could easily expedite President-elect Trumpâs plan to achieve record deportations,â said Surveillance Technology Oversight Project Research Director Eleni Manis. âTheyâve repeatedly helped ICE track down immigrants, including in cities and states that bar collusion and data-sharing for deportation purposes. Fusion centers also pose a clear threat to national security. Foreign powersâ persistently recruit American police officers. Itâs outrageous, then, that fusion centers give thousands of officers systematic access to national security agenciesâ databases. Cities and states need to cut ties with fusion centers now.â
âYou canât be both a sanctuary city and a surveillance state,â said Surveillance Technology Oversight Project Executive Director Albert Fox Cahn. âMany of the cities and counties that pledge to defend immigrant communities are actively sharing data with ICE that can be used to attack them. These centers have been national security bait-and-switch, abjectly failing at the original counter-terrorism mission, but succeeding at creating a potent threat to our undocumented neighbors. These surveillance boondoggles waste hundreds of millions each year, failing to deliver over and over again on their stated purpose.â
Key Findings Include:
- DHS fusion centers spend over $400 million each year to expand federal, state, and local intelligence sharing, including ICE;
- Fusion centers enable ICE to coopt local police databases and surveillance tools (like facial recognition) that otherwise couldnât be used for deportation purposes;
- Fusion center participants routinely give ICE sensitive data, violating state and local protections for undocumented immigrants;
- Local police officers use fusion centers to encourage ICE to target suspects when officers cannot find enough evidence to bring charges, effectively deporting their cold cases;
- Fusion centersâ opacity allows them to routinely violate state and local civil rights laws without consequence.
S.T.O.P. is an advocate of the New York For All Act, which would prohibit New Yorkâs state and local government agencies from colluding with ICE, disclosing data, and diverting resources to further federal immigration enforcement. In 2021, S.T.O.P. joined other prominent civil rights groups in filing a lawsuit on behalf of a group of California civil rights activists against Thomson Reuters, claiming the companyâs CLEAR database collects millions of Californiansâ utility records, criminal histories, credit reports, photographs, and other records and sells that data to ICE.
SEE - New York State Senate - Bill S987
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2023/S987
New York Focus - Will Hochul Fight Trumpâs Plan for âMass Deportationsâ?
https://nysfocus.com/2024/11/12/new-york-hochul-donald-trump-plan-deportations
S.T.O.P. â Thomson Reuters CLEAR Lawsuit
https://www.stopspying.org/clear
The Surveillance Technology Oversight Project is a non-profit advocacy organization and legal services provider. S.T.O.P. litigates and advocates for privacy, fighting excessive local and state-level surveillance. Our work highlights the discriminatory impact of surveillance on Muslim Americans, immigrants, and communities of color.
--END--
|
|
|
|